This is the fifth piece in series debating Clinton Wilcox at the Life Training Institute (a pro-life organisation) with the following chronology: JP: Abortion: The Human/Human Being Distinction CW: About the Alleged
I haven't talked about Trump for some time simply because there is not much else he can do to surprise me. He is compulsive viewing and I am continually engrossed with
If you're going to watch anything today, watch this. Bitecofer has really created a reputation for herself to be one of the most reliable and interesting pollsters and analysts around. Here,
In a post that covered a number of things, John Crawford, who normally comments here in protection of gun advocacy, a sort of faux-libertarianism and other positions, commented as follows: So, what is
This came from Antrotheist in response to skl, over on this thread. Skl started with: Your argument that “identity” changes constantly over time not only doesn’t make sense to me, it strikes
In other news: The president has trebled the number of religious İmam Hatip high schools in the country, steadily increased funding for Turkey’s religious affairs directorate and increased the powers of local
This is the fourth piece in series debating Clinton Wilcox at the Life Training Institute (a pro-life organisation) with the following chronology: JP: Abortion: The Human/Human Being Distinction CW: About the Alleged
Well, we did no homeschool learning today, but we did manage to create a new home dominoes rally, upgraded with some marbles. So there is that. The original from the other day is
Today, again, I am continuing my rebuttals of Clinton Wilcox over at Life Training Institute, a pro-life organisation, after he tackled a post I wrote concerning human/human being distinction. My original piece
To continue the rejoinder to Clinton Wilcox over at the Life Training Institute, who took issue with one of my posts looking at the pro-life/pro-choice debate concerning abortion. I responded to the
Anthrotheist made a strong point on another thread concerning what the central argument should be in the abortion debate: The abortion debate isn't about personhood or whether or not a nonviable
Being that we are happily debating the definition of naturalism on various threads here, after various posts, I thought I would defer to a post on Richard Carrier's old old blog