philpapers - A Tippling Philosopher

A Tippling Philosopher

Sign in Subscribe

philpapers

A collection of 9 posts

By Joreth (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Philosophy 101 (philpapers-induced) #12: Logic: classical or non-classical?

Having posted the Philpapers survey results, the biggest ever survey of philosophers conducted in 2009, several readers were not aware of it (the reason for re-communicating it) and were unsure as to what some of the questions meant. I offered to do a series on them, so here it is

By Joreth (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Philosophy 101 (philpapers induced) #10: Knowledge: Empiricism or Rationalism

Having posted the Philpapers survey results, the biggest ever survey of philosophers conducted in 2009, several readers were not aware of it (the reason for re-communicating it) and were unsure as to what some of the questions meant. I offered to do a series on them, so here it is

Philosophy 101 (philpapers induced) #1 - a priori knowledge: yes or no?

Philosophy 101 (philpapers induced) #1 - a priori knowledge: yes or no?

Due to this post being lost in the handover from SIN to PAtheos, I am reposting it for the records, to add to the list of other philpapers ones. This one is a shorter one than many of the others. So having posted the Philpapers survey results, the biggest ever

By Joreth (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

In the Meantime... Some Philpapers Links and Explanations

Patheos will be down for maintenance for most of today, so I will give you the back catalogue of my philpapers philosophical explanations as I am presently working on my new one, which I should have written by the end of tomorrow. Having posted the Philpapers survey results, the biggest

Wikimedia Commons

Philosophy 101 (philpapers induced) #8: Belief in God: theism or atheism?

Having posted the Philpapers survey results, the biggest ever survey of philosophers conducted in 2009, several readers were not aware of it (the reason for re-communicating it) and were unsure as to what some of the questions meant. I offered to do a series on them, so here it is – Philosophy 101 (

Philosophy 101 (philpapers induced) #6: External world: idealism, skepticism, or non-skeptical realism?

So having posted the Philpapers survey results, the biggest ever survey of philosophers conducted in 2009, several readers were not aware of it (the reason for re-communicating it) and were unsure as to what some of the questions were. I offered to do a series on them, so here it is – Philosophy 101

Philosophy 101 (philpapers induced) #4: Analytic-synthetic distinction

So having posted the Philpapers survey results, the biggest ever survey of philosophers conducted in 2009, several readers were not aware of it (the reason for re-communicating it) and were unsure as to what some of the questions were. I offered to do a series on them, so here it

Philosophy 101 (philpapers induced) #2 - Abstract objects: Platonism or nominalism

So having posted the Philpapers survey results, the biggest ever survey of philosophers conducted in 2009, several readers were not aware of it (the reason for re-communicating it) and were unsure as to what some of the questions meant. I offered to do a series on them, so here it is – Philosophy 10

Biggest ever survey of philosophers results

So the philpapers survey of philosophers is somewhere I often go to see what the general trend is for modern philosophers. Not so much as an argumentum ad populum - quite a number of the results are evenly split - but to get an idea of which positions are deemed most tenable by those in the know. It